AddThisFeature

Component Variant API

Give every component one consistent way to express size, tone, emphasis, and state.

involved Components & Primitives

What it adds

A shared variant vocabulary applied across the component set, with stable defaults and impossible combinations refused.

What your agent is told to do

5
  1. 1

    Inventory how the existing components already express difference — a primary flag on one, a kind string on another, a boolean per style on a third — and collapse them onto one vocabulary of size, tone, emphasis, and state.

  2. 2

    Name variants for their meaning rather than their appearance. A tone called danger survives a redesign; a tone called red does not, and it lies the moment the palette changes or the theme inverts.

  3. 3

    Give every variant prop a default that produces the most common correct result, so a component rendered with no variant props at all is still valid and typical.

  4. 4

    Refuse combinations that cannot be rendered coherently, at development time and with a message naming the conflict. A quiet emphasis with a destructive tone and a loading state may have no sensible appearance, and guessing one produces a control nobody designed.

  5. 5

    Do not add a variant for every one-off design request. Each new value multiplies the combinations that must be checked; if a screen needs something the vocabulary cannot express, that is a design conversation, not a new enum member.

Edge cases it handles

7
  • Conflicting variant combinations must be rejected rather than resolved by precedence. Silently letting one variant win produces a control that looks deliberate but was never designed, and the bug surfaces only when someone screenshots it.
  • Defaults must be stable across releases. Changing what an unspecified variant means re-styles every call site that relied on the default, and those call sites are exactly the ones nobody reviews.
  • Variant names must be semantic, not visual. Names describing colour, weight, or position break as soon as the theme changes, and they read as lies in a dark theme or a high-contrast mode.
  • The variant vocabulary must not defeat static typing or dead-code elimination. Values assembled dynamically from strings cannot be checked at build time and force the whole style surface to ship even when a handful of variants are used.
  • State variants such as loading, disabled, and invalid must not be settable in ways that contradict the component's actual behaviour — a control styled disabled while remaining clickable is a trap.
  • Every tone must remain legible against every surface it can appear on, including inverted panels and the dark theme, otherwise a valid combination produces unreadable text.
  • How a variant value varies across breakpoints belongs to Responsive Prop System; this brief owns the set of allowed values and their meaning, and the two must draw on one shared vocabulary.

Definition of done

9
  • Every component in the set expresses difference through the same variant vocabulary, with no leftover per-component flags.
  • Variant names describe meaning rather than appearance.
  • A component rendered with no variant props produces a valid, typical result.
  • Incoherent variant combinations raise a development-time error naming the conflict.
  • Variant values are statically known, so unused styles are eliminated from the build.
  • Every tone is legible on every surface it can appear on, in both light and dark themes.
  • State variants match the component's real interactive behaviour.
  • The feature matches the existing design system.
  • No existing functionality is broken.

Related features

How it works

  1. 1

    Copy the link

    Grab the Markdown instruction URL for this feature.

  2. 2

    Give it to your AI

    Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, v0, Lovable — whatever you build with.

  3. 3

    It inspects, then implements

    Your agent reads your existing app first, then adds the feature to fit it.

Works with your stack

These instructions are written to adapt. They tell the agent to detect your framework, match your existing design system, and reuse what you already have — rather than assuming a particular stack.

Need it tighter than that? Customize the feature and tell it exactly what you're running.