AddThisFeature

Component Prop Guardrails

Make impossible prop combinations fail at the point of use rather than in production.

moderate Components & Primitives

What it adds

Validation on shared component props that rejects contradictory or meaningless combinations as early as the codebase allows.

What your agent is told to do

5
  1. 1

    Go through the shared components and write down which prop combinations are actually supported. Most components have grown two or three arrangements that were never intended and are held together by defensive branches inside the render.

  2. 2

    Replace piles of independent booleans with a single named variant. A component taking a primary flag, a danger flag, and a ghost flag admits combinations nobody has ever designed, and each one has to be resolved arbitrarily at render time.

  3. 3

    Express the same rule twice — once in the static type layer so it is caught while editing, and once as a runtime check so it is caught in tests and in development builds. The two must agree; a runtime check that permits something the types forbid is worse than neither.

  4. 4

    In production the guardrail must report and degrade, never crash. Log the offending combination with the component name and pick a defined fallback rendering rather than throwing inside a render path.

  5. 5

    Do not tighten a rule silently. Record what changed and what the supported replacement is, and hand removal of the old shape to the process described in Component Deprecation Path rather than deleting the prop in the same change.

Edge cases it handles

7
  • Prefer one discriminated variant prop over several independent booleans, because a set of booleans multiplies into states that were never designed and forces the component to invent a precedence order at render time.
  • The runtime validation and the static types must describe exactly the same rule. When they drift, developers trust the editor, tests pass against the looser check, and the invalid combination reaches users.
  • A violation in production must warn and fall back rather than crash. A guardrail that throws inside a render turns a cosmetic mistake into a blank screen, which is a worse outcome than the wrong variant.
  • Every tightened rule needs to be documented where the component is used, not only in its source, so callers who hit the new error know which shape replaced theirs.
  • Warnings must be deduplicated per component and per combination, or a component rendered in a long list floods the console and the real message is lost.
  • Props whose values come from server data or user configuration cannot be validated by types alone, so those paths need the runtime check and a defined behaviour for an unrecognised value.
  • Validation must not run on every render of a hot component in production; the check belongs in development and test builds, with only cheap assertions left in place.

Definition of done

8
  • Contradictory prop combinations are rejected in the type layer and by an equivalent runtime check.
  • Shared components expose named variants rather than overlapping boolean flags.
  • An invalid combination in production logs a warning and renders a defined fallback instead of throwing.
  • Repeated violations from the same component produce one warning, not one per render.
  • Every tightened rule is documented at the point of use with its supported replacement.
  • Props sourced from data outside the codebase have a defined behaviour for unrecognised values.
  • The feature matches the existing design system.
  • No existing functionality is broken.

Related features

How it works

  1. 1

    Copy the link

    Grab the Markdown instruction URL for this feature.

  2. 2

    Give it to your AI

    Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, v0, Lovable — whatever you build with.

  3. 3

    It inspects, then implements

    Your agent reads your existing app first, then adds the feature to fit it.

Works with your stack

These instructions are written to adapt. They tell the agent to detect your framework, match your existing design system, and reuse what you already have — rather than assuming a particular stack.

Need it tighter than that? Customize the feature and tell it exactly what you're running.