AddThisFeature

AI Key Point Extraction

Reduce long content to the decisions, facts, and requests that actually matter.

moderate AI Analysis & Search

What it adds

A short list of the salient points in a long document or thread, each tied back to the passage it came from.

What your agent is told to do

5
  1. 1

    Apply this where length is the problem: long threads, meeting notes, call transcripts, lengthy tickets, multi-page documents. Content that already fits on a screen does not need extracting.

  2. 2

    Classify each point by kind — decision, fact, risk, request, open question — so a reader can scan for the category they came for instead of reading a flat list.

  3. 3

    Carry a reference to the source passage with every point and let the reader jump to it. A point nobody can verify is a claim, not a summary.

  4. 4

    Copy figures, dates, names, and identifiers through verbatim and verify each one appears in the source before display. Rounding a number or shifting a date inside a summary is the failure mode that destroys trust in the whole feature.

  5. 5

    Cache the result against a content hash so reopening a thread does not re-run the model, and only regenerate when the underlying content changes.

Edge cases it handles

8
  • Numbers, dates, monetary amounts, and identifiers must survive unchanged. Check each against the source text and drop any point containing a figure that cannot be found there.
  • Repetition is not importance. A phrase in every message of a thread is usually boilerplate or a signature, and weighting by frequency surfaces exactly the wrong content.
  • Keep what was established apart from what was suggested. Marking a proposal as a decision changes the meaning of the thread, so label facts, decisions, and recommendations distinctly.
  • Every point needs a link back to its passage, and in a thread that means the specific message rather than the thread as a whole.
  • Thin or purely social content should yield two points or none. Padding a list to a fixed length forces the model to invent significance that is not there.
  • Long content must be chunked and the per-chunk points merged, with near-duplicates collapsed so the same decision does not appear three times in different words.
  • In a thread with mixed permissions, only include content the viewer is allowed to read. A summary is a distribution channel, and it will leak a restricted message as readily as any other.
  • If the model is unavailable or returns a truncated list, show the original content with an unavailable notice. Never present a partial list as the full set of key points.

Definition of done

9
  • Every point is typed as a decision, fact, risk, request, or open question.
  • Every point links to the specific source passage or message.
  • Numbers, dates, and identifiers in points match the source exactly.
  • Sparse content produces few or no points rather than padded output.
  • Results are cached against a content hash and regenerate only when the source changes.
  • Points derived from content the viewer cannot access are excluded.
  • A truncated or failed run shows an unavailable state rather than a partial list.
  • The feature matches the existing design system.
  • No existing functionality is broken.

Related features

How it works

  1. 1

    Copy the link

    Grab the Markdown instruction URL for this feature.

  2. 2

    Give it to your AI

    Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor, v0, Lovable — whatever you build with.

  3. 3

    It inspects, then implements

    Your agent reads your existing app first, then adds the feature to fit it.

Works with your stack

These instructions are written to adapt. They tell the agent to detect your framework, match your existing design system, and reuse what you already have — rather than assuming a particular stack.

Need it tighter than that? Customize the feature and tell it exactly what you're running.